Diagnostic Accuracy of AI in Radiographic Detection of Dental Caries and Periapical Lesions

Authors

  • Saher Ahmed Department of Dental Materials, Hamdard University Dental Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan Author
  • Rabia Masood Dental Department, Shaikh Zayed Medical Complex, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Ifrah Rashid Fatima Memorial Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Amna Jamil Haq Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan Author
  • Rehmeen Asif Hussain College of Allied Health Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Syeda Tooba Sajjad Department of Orthodontics, Azra Naheed Medical and Dental College, Islamabad, Pakistan Author
  • Nahel Tasnim Watim Dental College, Islamabad, Pakistan Author
  • Wajahat Ullah Khan Dentist , Sardar Begum Dental college , Islamabad, Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61919/4w0nfp45

Keywords:

artificial intelligence; dental caries; periapical lesions; diagnostic accuracy; deep learning; intraoral radiography; sensitivity; specificity

Abstract

Background: Accurate detection of dental caries and periapical lesions is critical for timely intervention and preservation of tooth structure, yet conventional radiographic interpretation is limited by observer variability and diagnostic fatigue. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) offer automated image analysis with the potential to enhance diagnostic consistency and sensitivity in dental radiology. Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of an AI-based radiographic tool with conventional clinical and radiographic examination for detecting dental caries and periapical lesions in adult dental patients. Methods: In this prospective diagnostic accuracy study, 240 adults undergoing intraoral periapical and bitewing radiography at a tertiary dental hospital in Lahore were consecutively enrolled. Two calibrated dentists performed conventional examinations using ICDAS II and PAI, blinded to AI outputs. A deep learning–based AI software analyzed all radiographs. Expert consensus by a radiologist and endodontist served as reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, accuracy, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were calculated; McNemar’s and DeLong’s tests compared methods. Results: For caries detection, AI achieved sensitivity 91.7%, specificity 89.2%, and AUC 0.94, versus 83.4%, 81.6%, and 0.87 for conventional examination (all p ≤ 0.001). For periapical lesions, AI sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 93.5%, 88.9%, and 0.96, compared with 84.8%, 80.2%, and 0.85 for conventional methods (all p ≤ 0.002). Conclusion: AI-based radiographic analysis demonstrated significantly superior diagnostic accuracy to conventional examination for both dental caries and periapical lesions, supporting its use as an adjunctive tool in routine dental diagnostics.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Diagnostic Accuracy of AI in Radiographic Detection of Dental Caries and Periapical Lesions. (2025). Link Medical Journal, 3(1), e55. https://doi.org/10.61919/4w0nfp45

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 14

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.