Association Between Family Structure and Speech and Language Delay in Children

Authors

  • Marwa Speech and Language Pathologist, Corner Stone, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Muhammad Sikander Ghayas Khan Professor, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, FAHS, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61919/v5dg8m71

Keywords:

Speech delay; Language delay; Family structure; Caregiver interaction; Screen exposure; Children.

Abstract

Background: Speech and language development in early childhood is strongly influenced by environmental and familial factors, particularly caregiver interaction, socioeconomic context, and household composition. Family structure may shape the quantity and quality of linguistic exposure through caregiver availability, supervision patterns, and communication practices. However, limited evidence exists from urban Pakistani clinical settings examining how family structure and related environmental factors coexist among children presenting with speech delay. Objective: To determine the association between family structure and speech and language delay among children attending tertiary care hospitals in Lahore, Pakistan, and to explore related caregiving and environmental characteristics. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted from July to December 2025 at Sehat Medical Complex and the University of Lahore Teaching Hospital. Sixty-eight children aged 3–9 years with clinically confirmed speech delay were recruited using purposive sampling. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire assessing family structure, parental education, household income, caregiver type, daily parent–child interaction time, storytelling frequency, and screen exposure. Descriptive statistics were generated using SPSS version 25. Results: Moderate speech delay was most prevalent (50.0%), followed by severe (26.5%) and mild (23.5%). Joint families constituted 52.9% of cases, nuclear families 38.2%, and single-parent households 8.8%. Male children represented 60.3% of participants. Low household income was reported in 79.4% of families. Limited daily interaction (≤2 hours) was observed in 77.9% of cases, while 83.8% engaged only occasionally or rarely in storytelling activities. Screen exposure ≥1 hour daily was reported in 77.9% of children. Conclusion: Children with speech delay in this clinical sample commonly resided in joint or non-nuclear family systems and experienced limited structured verbal interaction alongside considerable screen exposure. Household composition appears to interact with caregiving practices and socioeconomic factors, underscoring the importance of family-centered early intervention strategies. 

References

1. Jullien S. Screening for language and speech delay in children under five years. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21(Suppl 1):362.

2. Erturk B, Hansen SG, Machalicek W, Kunze M. Parent-implemented early social communication intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorder. J Behav Educ. 2021;30:641–663.

3. McGregor KK, Goffman L, Van Horne AO, Hogan TP, Finestack LH. Developmental language disorder: Applications for advocacy, research, and clinical service. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2020;5(1):38–46.

4. Hildebrand MS, Jackson VE, Scerri TS, Van Reyk O, Coleman M, Braden RO, et al. Severe childhood speech disorder: Gene discovery highlights transcriptional dysregulation. Neurology. 2020;94(20):e2148–e2167.

5. Dillon E, Holingue C, Herman D, Landa RJ. Psychometrics of the pragmatic rating scale for school-age children with a range of linguistic and social communication skills. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021;64(9):3477–3488.

6. Lane JD, Brown JA. Child communication research and practice: Collaborative roles for behavior analysts and speech-language pathologists. Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci. 2023;10(1):104–112.

7. Calder SD, Brennan‐Jones CG, Robinson M, Whitehouse AJO, Hill E. The prevalence of and potential risk factors for developmental language disorder at 10 years in the Raine Study. J Paediatr Child Health. 2022;58(11):2044–2050.

8. Zaib R, Yaqoob M, Iftikhar N, Qureshi EMA, Rehman A. Delayed speech in children of working and non-working mothers in Lahore, Pakistan: Prevalence and associated factors. J Fatima Jinnah Med Univ. 2022;16(3):124–129.

9. Dinisman T, Andresen S, Montserrat C, Strózik D, Strózik T. Family structure and family relationship from the child well-being perspective: Findings from comparative analysis. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2017;80:105–115.

10. Qu G, Hu W, Meng J, Wang X, Su W, Liu H, et al. Association between screen time and developmental and behavioral problems among children in the United States: Evidence from 2018 to 2020 NSCH. J Psychiatr Res. 2023;161:140–149.

11. Aslam I, Mumtaz N, Saqulain G. Prevalence of speech sound disorders among primary school children. J Islamabad Med Dent Coll. 2020;9(3):195–200.

12. Ceramidas D, Forn de Zita C, Eklund M, Kirsh B. The 2009 world team of mental health occupational therapists: A resilient and dedicated workforce. World Fed Occup Ther Bull. 2009;60(1):9–17.

13. Kaderavek JN, Henbest VS. Language disorders in children: Fundamental concepts of assessment and intervention. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2024.

14. McKean C, Law J, Mensah FK, Cini E, Eadie P, Frazer K, et al. Early childhood speech and language delay: Risk factors and outcomes in a population-based cohort study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019;61(3):329–337.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Association Between Family Structure and Speech and Language Delay in Children. (2025). Link Medical Journal, 3(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.61919/v5dg8m71

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

11-20 of 40

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.