Barriers to Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation in Low-Resource Settings: A Critical Narrative Review and Conceptual Synthesis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61919/mmg6yk14Keywords:
Spinal cord injury; rehabilitation; low-resource settings; low- and middle-income countries; access to care; neurorehabilitation; health systems; community reintegrationAbstract
Background: Spinal cord injury is associated with long-term disability, secondary complications, reduced participation, and substantial dependence on rehabilitation services. In low- and middle-income countries, rehabilitation access remains constrained by fragmented service delivery, limited workforce capacity, financial barriers, weak referral systems, and poor community-based support. Although previous literature has described individual barriers to rehabilitation, less attention has been given to how these barriers interact across the continuum of care. Objective: To critically synthesize evidence on barriers to spinal cord injury rehabilitation in low-resource settings and develop a conceptual framework explaining how multi-level barriers influence access, continuity, participation, and outcomes. Methods: A structured narrative review was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL. Literature published between January 2010 and March 2026 was considered. Eligible sources examined spinal cord injury rehabilitation or directly relevant disability rehabilitation services in low- and middle-income countries, with focus on access, service delivery, continuity, barriers, or outcomes. Evidence was synthesized thematically across system-level, service-level, socioeconomic, and patient-level domains, with particular attention to transition points across the rehabilitation pathway. Results: Twenty-two studies/sources were included in the narrative synthesis. The evidence consistently showed that rehabilitation barriers operate cumulatively rather than independently. System-level constraints, including policy gaps, limited financing, and workforce shortages, contributed to restricted service availability and weak referral pathways. Service fragmentation, high out-of-pocket costs, transport barriers, limited community-based rehabilitation, low awareness, stigma, and poor adherence further disrupted continuity of care, especially during transitions from acute care to rehabilitation and from institutional rehabilitation to community reintegration. Conclusion: Spinal cord injury rehabilitation in low-resource settings is best understood as a pathway-level systems challenge. Effective reform requires integrated rehabilitation planning, structured referral and discharge systems, community-based rehabilitation expansion, financial protection, and context-specific strategies to reduce geographic and social inequities
References
1. Lee B, Cripps RA, Fitzharris M, Wing P. The global map for traumatic spinal cord injury epidemiology: update 2011, global incidence rate. Spinal Cord. 2014;52(2):110-116.
2. Cripps RA, Lee BB, Wing P, Weerts E, Mackay J, Brown D. A global map for traumatic spinal cord injury epidemiology: towards a living data repository for injury prevention. Spinal Cord. 2011;49(4):493-501.
3. Reynolds TA, Stewart B, Drewett I, Salerno S, Sawe HR, Toroyan T, et al. The impact of trauma care systems in low- and middle-income countries. Annu Rev Public Health. 2017;38:507-532.
4. World Health Organization, International Spinal Cord Society. International perspectives on spinal cord injury. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
5. Reinhardt JD, Middleton J, Bökel A, Kovindha A, Kyriakides A, Hajjioui A, et al. Environmental barriers experienced by people with spinal cord injury across 22 countries: results from a cross-sectional survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101(12):2144-2156.
6. Jorge A, White MD, Agarwal N. Outcomes in socioeconomically disadvantaged patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;29(6):680-686.
7. Barclay L, McDonald R, Lentin P. Social and community participation following spinal cord injury: a critical review. Int J Rehabil Res. 2015;38(1):1-19.
8. Neill R, Shawar YR, Ashraf L, Das P, Champagne SN, Kautsar H, et al. Prioritizing rehabilitation in low- and middle-income country national health systems: a qualitative thematic synthesis and development of a policy framework. Int J Equity Health. 2023;22(1):91.
9. Bright T, Wallace S, Kuper H. A systematic review of access to rehabilitation for people with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(10):2165.
10. Uddin T, Islam MT, Rathore FA, O'Connell C. Disability and rehabilitation medicine in Bangladesh: current scenario and future perspectives. J Int Soc Phys Rehabil Med. 2019;2(4):168-177.
11. Burns AS, O'Connell C. The challenge of spinal cord injury care in the developing world. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012;35(1):3-8.
12. Tian T, Zhang S, Yang M. Recent progress and challenges in the treatment of spinal cord injury. Protein Cell. 2023;14(9):635-652.
13. Booth S, Kendall M. Benefits and challenges of providing transitional rehabilitation services to people with spinal cord injury from regional, rural and remote locations. Aust J Rural Health. 2007;15(3):172-178.
14. Rathore FA, Farooq F, Muzammil S, New PW, Ahmad N, Haig AJ. Spinal cord injury management and rehabilitation: highlights and shortcomings from the 2005 earthquake in Pakistan. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(3):579-585.
15. Rathore FA, New PW, Iftikhar A. A report on disability and rehabilitation medicine in Pakistan: past, present, and future directions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(1):161-166.
16. Khan F, Amatya B, Mannan H, Rathore F. Neurorehabilitation in developing countries: challenges and the way forward. Phys Med Rehabil Int. 2015;2(9):1070.
17. Rathore FA, Mansoor SN. Neurorehabilitation in Pakistan: needs, challenges and opportunities. Khyber Med Univ J. 2016;8:59-60.
18. Solomon RM, Dhakal R, Halpin SJ, Hariharan R, O'Connor RJ, Allsop M, et al. Telerehabilitation for individuals with spinal cord injury in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the literature. Spinal Cord. 2022;60(5):395-403.
19. Alve YA, Bontje P. Factors influencing participation in daily activities by persons with spinal cord injury: lessons learned from an international scoping review. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2019;25(1):41-61.
20. Pacheco Barzallo D, Oña A, Gemperli A. Unmet health care needs and inequality: a cross-country comparison of the situation of people with spinal cord injury. Health Serv Res. 2021;56:1429-1440.
21. Covell MM, Naik A, Shaffer A, Cramer SW, Alan N, Shabani HK, et al. Social determinants of health impact spinal cord injury outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a meta-epidemiological study. Neurosurgery. 2024;94(5):893-902.
22. Ranjbar Hameghavandi MH, Khodadoust E, Hassan Zadeh Tabatabaei MS, Farahbakhsh F, Ghodsi Z, Rostamkhani S, et al. Challenges in traumatic spinal cord injury care in developing countries: a scoping review. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1377513.
23. Scovil CY, Ranabhat MK, Craighead IB, Wee J. Follow-up study of spinal cord injured patients after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation in Nepal in 2007. Spinal Cord. 2012;50(3):232-237.
24. Mlenzana NB, Frantz JM, Rhoda AJ, Eide AH. Barriers to and facilitators of rehabilitation services for people with physical disabilities: a systematic review. Afr J Disabil. 2013;2(1):1-6.
25. Borg J, Lindström A, Larsson S. Assistive technology in developing countries: a review from the perspective of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011;35(1):20-29.
26. Bright T, Kuper H. A systematic review of access to general healthcare services for people with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(9):1879.
27. Rahman A, Ahmed MS, Taoheed F, Hasan MS, Helal SU, Hossain SS, et al. Spinal cord injury in Bangladesh, 2011-2021: an 11-year single-centre epidemiological study. medRxiv. 2025. doi:10.1101/2025.10.08.25337543.
28. Draulans N, Kiekens C, Roels E, Peers K. Etiology of spinal cord injuries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Spinal Cord. 2011;49(12):1148-1154.
29. Tinney M, Chiodo A, Haig A, Wiredu E. Medical rehabilitation in Ghana. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(11-12):921-927.
30. Atijosan O, Rischewski D, Simms V, Kuper H, Linganwa B, Nuhi A, et al. A national survey of musculoskeletal impairment in Rwanda: prevalence, causes and service implications. PLoS One. 2008;3(7):e2851.
31. World Health Organization. Rehabilitation in health systems. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
32. Stucki G, Bickenbach J, Gutenbrunner C, Melvin JL. Rehabilitation: the health strategy of the 21st century. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(4):309-316.
33. Shakespeare T, Bright T, Kuper H. Access to health for persons with disabilities. Geneva: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights; 2018.
34. Mitra S, Posarac A, Vick B. Disability and poverty in developing countries: a snapshot from the World Health Survey. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2011.
35. Thietje R, Hirschfeld S. Epidemiology of spinal cord injury. In: Weidner N, Rupp R, Tansey KE, editors. Neurological aspects of spinal cord injury. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 3-17.
36. Middleton JW, Dayton A, Walsh J, Rutkowski S, Leong G, Duong S. Life expectancy after spinal cord injury: a 50-year study. Spinal Cord. 2012;50(11):803-811.
37. LaVela SL, Wu J, Nevedal AL, Harris AH, Frayne SM, Arnow KD, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on individuals living with spinal cord injury: a qualitative study. Rehabil Psychol. 2023;68(1):12-22.
38. Jesus TS, Landry MD, Dussault G, Fronteira I. Human resources for health and rehabilitation: six rehab-workforce challenges for the century. Hum Resour Health. 2017;15(1):8.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sidra Tul Muntaha, Mansoor Ahmad, Muhammad Adnan, Iqra Javed, Muqaddas Yaqoob, Areesha Tanveer, Warda Khan, Etisam Wahid, Shahzad Ahmad, Ayesha Nisar (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© The Authors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).




.png)