Effects of Shi Style Cervical Mobilization Versus Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides on Pain, Strength and Functional Disability in Patients with Cervicogenic Headache
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61919/n8wffa20Keywords:
Cervicogenic headache, manual therapy, SNAGs, cervical mobilization, randomized controlled trial, pain, disability.Abstract
Background: Cervicogenic headache is a secondary headache disorder originating from cervical spine dysfunction, commonly associated with pain, reduced mobility, dizziness, and functional disability, with manual therapy representing a key conservative management strategy. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of Shi-style cervical mobilization and Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGs) on pain intensity, cervical muscle strength, dizziness-related disability, functional disability, and quality of life in patients with cervicogenic headache. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 40 participants allocated equally into two groups receiving either Shi-style cervical mobilization or SNAGs over a two-week period, alongside standardized physiotherapy. Outcomes including Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), pressure biofeedback, Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and SF-36 were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Non-parametric statistical tests were applied with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements across all outcomes (p < 0.001). However, Shi-style mobilization resulted in greater reductions in pain (median 6.0 to 2.0 vs 3.0), disability (NDI: 32.0 to 7.0 vs 17.0), and dizziness (DHI: 53.0 to 21.0 vs 23.5), with moderate to large effect sizes (r = 0.42–0.79). Conclusion: Both interventions are effective, but Shi-style cervical mobilization demonstrates superior clinical outcomes and may be considered a more effective treatment approach for cervicogenic headache.
References
1. Haldeman S, Dagenais S. Cervicogenic headaches: a critical review. Spine J. 2001;1(1):31–46.
2. Biondi DM. Cervicogenic headache: a review of diagnostic and treatment strategies. J Osteopath Med. 2005;105(4 Suppl):16–22.
3. Antonaci F, Fredriksen TA, Sjaastad O. Cervicogenic headache: clinical presentation, diagnostic criteria, and differential diagnosis. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2001;5:387–92.
4. Yao M, Tang ZY, Cui XJ, Sun YL, Ye XL, Wang P, et al. Shi-style cervical mobilizations versus massage for cervical vertigo: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. 2020;26(1):58–66.
5. Cavallaro Goodman C, Fuller KS. Pathology: implications for the physical therapist. St Louis: Saunders; 2009.
6. Nilsson N. The prevalence of cervicogenic headache in a random population sample of 20–59 year olds. Spine. 1995;20(17):1884–8.
7. Bogduk N, Govind J. Cervicogenic headache: an assessment of the evidence on clinical diagnosis, invasive tests, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(10):959–68.
8. Bogduk N. The neck and headaches. Neurol Clin. 2014;32(2):471–87.
9. Vincent MB. Cervicogenic headache: the neck is a generator. Headache. 2010;50(4):706–9.
10. Park SK, Yang DJ, Kim JH, Heo JW, Uhm YH, Yoon JH. Analysis of mechanical properties of cervical muscles in patients with cervicogenic headache. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017;29(2):332–5.
11. Xu Y, Gao Y, Jiang L, Wu L, Yin J, Yang Z, et al. Global trends in research on cervicogenic headache: a bibliometric analysis. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1169477.
12. Hall T, Briffa K, Hopper D. Clinical evaluation of cervicogenic headache: a clinical perspective. J Man Manip Ther. 2008;16(2):73–80.
13. Fredriksen TA, Hovdal H, Sjaastad O. Cervicogenic headache: clinical manifestation. Cephalalgia. 1987;7(2):147–60.
14. Gallagher RM. Cervicogenic headache. Expert Rev Neurother. 2007;7(10):1279–83.
15. Bogduk N, Govind J. Cervicogenic headache: evidence on diagnosis and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(10):959–68.
16. Fernández-De-Las-Peñas C, Cuadrado ML. Therapeutic options for cervicogenic headache. Expert Rev Neurother. 2014;14(1):39–49.
17. Cui XJ, Yao M, Ye XL, Wang P, Zhong WH, Zhang RC, et al. Shi-style cervical manipulations for cervical radiculopathy: a randomized-controlled clinical trial. Medicine. 2017;96(31):e7276.
18. Naz I, Ahmad Z, Aziz S, Azhar N, Fatima A, Ali M. Effects of sustained natural apophyseal glide on adhesive capsulitis patients. Rawal Med J. 2021;46(2):334–8.
19. De Vestel C, Vereeck L, Reid SA, Van Rompaey V, Lemmens J, De Hertogh W. Therapeutic management of cervicogenic dizziness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Man Manip Ther. 2022;30(5):273–83.
20. Luedtke K, Starke W, May A. Musculoskeletal dysfunction in migraine patients. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(5):865–75.
21. Zhang M, Du G, Liu C, Li W, Yang J, Chen B, et al. Shi-style cervical manipulation therapy for neck pain: study protocol. Trials. 2021;22:1–15.
22. Mohamed AA, Shendy WS, Semary M, Mourad HS, Battecha KH, Soliman ES, et al. Combined cervical SNAG techniques in cervicogenic headache. J Phys Ther Sci. 2019;31(4):376–81.
23. Bini P, Hohenschurz-Schmidt D, Masullo V, Pitt D, Draper-Rodi J. Effectiveness of manual therapy on cervicogenic headache: systematic review. Chiropr Man Therap. 2022;30(1):49.
24. Kang DY. Deep cervical flexor training with pressure biofeedback. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(10):3207–10.
25. Rafiq S, Zafar H, Gillani SA, Waqas MS, Zia A, Liaqat S, et al. Neural mobilization versus conservative treatment in cervical radiculopathy. PLoS One. 2022;17(12):e0278177.
26. Ali H, Nasir RH, Hassan D. Cervical mobilization versus traction in neck pain. J Riphah Coll Rehabil Sci. 2015;3(2):80–5.
27. Creighton D, Gruca M, Marsh D, Murphy N. Non-thrust mobilization techniques in cervical rotation. J Man Manip Ther. 2014;22(4):206–12.
28. Lagoutaris C, Sullivan J, Hancock M, Leaver AM. Cervical spine mobilization approaches: pilot RCT. Chiropr Man Therap. 2020;28:1–8.
29. Cleland JA, Childs MJD, McRae M, Palmer JA, Stowell T. Thoracic manipulation in neck pain. Man Ther. 2005;10(2):127–35.
30. Mulligan BR. Manual therapy: NAGS, SNAGS, MWMs. Wellington: Plane View Services; 1999.
31. Dias D, Neto MG, Sales SSR, Cavalcante BS, Torrierri P, Roever L, et al. Mobilization with movement on pain and disability: systematic review. J Clin Med. 2023;12(23):7416.
32. Effects of end-range mobilization technique on pain and disability in adhesive capsulitis. 2020.
33. Gross A, Paquin JP, Dupont G, Blanchette S, Lalonde P, Cristie T, et al. Exercises for mechanical neck disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(1):CD004250.
34. Hidalgo B, Hall T, Bossert J, Dugeny A, Cagnie B, Pitance L. Manual therapy and exercise for neck pain: systematic review. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017;30(6):1149–69.
35. Dunning JR, Butts R, Mourad F, Young I, Flannagan SP, Perreault T. Cervical manipulation versus mobilization in cervicogenic headache. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016;46(3):145–56.
36. Falla D, Jull G, Hodges P. Deep cervical flexor dysfunction in neck pain. Spine. 2004;29(19):2108–14.
37. Treleaven J. Dizziness and postural control after whiplash. Spine. 2011;36(25 Suppl):S211–7.
38. Kay TM, Gross A, Goldsmith CH, Rutherford S, Voth S, Hoving JL, et al. Exercises for neck disorders. Spine. 2005;30(19):E629–45.
39. Miller J, Gross A, D’Sylva J, Burnie SJ, Goldsmith CH, Graham N, et al. Manual therapy and exercise for neck pain. Man Ther. 2010;15(4):334–54.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ayesha Khalid Malik, Ayesha Habib, Ayyaz Ahmad, Hafiza Aroosa Syed, Huma Khan, Muhammad Haris (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© The Authors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
.png)
